<meta name='google-adsense-platform-account' content='ca-host-pub-1556223355139109'/> <meta name='google-adsense-platform-domain' content='blogspot.com'/> <!-- --><style type="text/css">@import url(https://www.blogger.com/static/v1/v-css/navbar/3334278262-classic.css); div.b-mobile {display:none;} </style> </head><body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/3406587842336311136?origin\x3dhttp://lufterz-lufterz.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Good things always come in threes?
Friday, August 17, 2007





3.0 Theorem Good things always comes in threes (... ?)


Prologue: I was watching ANTM and saw this photo with this text that says "Good things always come in threes". How interesting...


Suppose there are 3 non-collinear points in a 2D space. Let p1, p2 and p3 be these 3 points in this space.

Mr Euclid once said that "any 3 NON COLLINEAR POINTS form a TRIANGLE, a basic shape in geometry". The word "basic" suggests it is a fundamental shape/theory which many more complex ones will be built upon the seemingly harmless TRIANGLE, and here we go.

My math teacher taught us that n-sided polygon is formed by (n-2) triangles. And true enough, you can get 2 triangles out of a 4sided polygon, 3 triangles from a 5-sided polygon, so on and so forth. This is the first time I see this pricky darn thing spanning a series of formulas and theorems. IRRITATING...yes. But manageable. If there is a tinge of IRRITATION at this stage already, should I still comply with theorem 3.0? *shrugz*

Few years later, my math professor decided that maybe we should learn how to integrate triangles in a 3D space to get the respective volumes. 2-3 weeks into my calculus lecture, other n-sided polygons appeared in the later part of my calculus notes. Geez, you should have taken a look at the help sheet I brought into my calculas exam hall at the end of that semester; it was so cluttered with graphs, formulas and theorems that it looked almost like a blue colored paper that you can buy off the shelf. At that point of time, I truly understand that THREE is a BASIS OF EVIL ELEMENTS that spans nothing but A VOLUME OF PROBLEMS!

Contradiction arises. Therefore, Theorem 3.0 is NOT TRUE (proven)! Honestly, GOOD THINGS DON'T COME IN THREES!


Corollary. If you are involved with the number "3" or a "TRIANGLE" right now, I am telling you again that they are nothing but a BASIS OF EVIL ELEMENTS THAT GENERATES VOLUMES OF PROBLEMS, based on my experience.

Labels:



--what some might say --
12:43 AM




Counters


cheerz
|slayerette|
|adobe photoshop|
|foto decadent|
|jigsaw puzzle|
|imageshack|
|blogger|