<meta name='google-adsense-platform-account' content='ca-host-pub-1556223355139109'/> <meta name='google-adsense-platform-domain' content='blogspot.com'/> <!-- --><style type="text/css">@import url(https://www.blogger.com/static/v1/v-css/navbar/3334278262-classic.css); div.b-mobile {display:none;} </style> </head><body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/3406587842336311136?origin\x3dhttp://lufterz-lufterz.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

And so she apologized...
Tuesday, February 12, 2008


She apologized for the nude photo scandal...because as a public figure, she ought to be socially responsible for her "squeaky clean image" which earns her her ardent fans that are made up of mostly teenagers. This, I understand.
BUT IF (yes, I am taking risks and making loads of assumptions) she had apologized because she made the choice of recording those moments and that "private collection" had been posted online... against her wish, I start to wonder why. Because she should have remained untainted till the day she ties the knot...to be socially acceptable *snort*? Or because recording moments of physical initimacy is sinful *SNORT* ? Please lar...give her a break.


--what some might say --
10:51 PM




Counters


cheerz
|slayerette|
|adobe photoshop|
|foto decadent|
|jigsaw puzzle|
|imageshack|
|blogger|